AuraPACS reporting lives next to the images. The radiologist opens the study in the browser, picks the template for that modality and region, fills the findings, signs off, and the PDF is attached to the study and to the share link. No Word documents, no separate folder.
Radiology reporting software gives the radiologist a structured template for each kind of study, captures the findings and impression, and produces a signed report that stays with the images. In AuraPACS the report is written in the same browser window as the viewer, finalised to a PDF, attached to the study and included in the secure link sent to the referrer.
The difference from typing in a document is where the report ends up. A Word file in a folder is unconnected to the study, gets renamed, and is emailed as an attachment. A report on the study is found by searching the patient, opens with the images, and goes out with them.
Most delay between a scan and a result is not the radiologist's reading time. It is the handling around the report.
Each CT abdomen report starts from nothing, so the same normal findings are retyped daily.
The images are on the PACS, the report is in a documents folder named by date, and the two never meet.
A typist transcribes, the radiologist corrects on paper, the front desk prints. Each hand-off adds hours.
Nobody can say who finalised the report or when, because a document has no audit trail.
The referrer receives a PDF by email with no way to see the images it describes.
A corrected report replaces the original file and the earlier version is gone.
Received studies appear as unread for the radiologist's role.
Images and the report editor side by side in one browser tab.
Modality and region pick the template: CT brain, MR lumbar spine, ultrasound abdomen.
Structured sections filled; normal text kept, abnormal text edited.
The radiologist finalises; the PDF is generated with your branding and attached to the study.
The secure link now carries the images and the report together.
Workflow: The template opens with standard normal findings; the radiologist confirms and signs.
Result: The report is on the study and shared before the patient has left the waiting area.
Workflow: The visiting radiologist opens the pending list in a browser, reports and finalises.
Result: No document to email back to the centre for printing.
Workflow: Front desk resends the secure link; it opens the images and the PDF together.
Result: No confusion between two studies on the same day.
Workflow: The patient's history is searched and the earlier study opens with its signed PDF.
Result: No folder search by date.
Templates that match how they already dictate.
Turnaround measured in hours, not days.
Consultants find the report on the study from the ward.
Ultrasound reports written and shared in the same sitting.
One place to see what is pending and what is signed.
Yes. Templates are structured per modality and region, and they are set up with your centre's wording and branding during implementation. The finalised PDF looks like your report, not a generic one.
Yes. The viewer and the report editor sit in one browser tab, so the radiologist scrolls slices and writes findings without switching applications. See DICOM viewer.
Only users with the radiologist role. Technician, front desk and referrer roles see what their role allows, and every action is audited. See radiology workflow.
Yes. Reporting works the same way from home or a second site through the cloud layer, in a browser with nothing installed.
The signed PDF is attached to the study, and a secure link sent on WhatsApp opens the report and the images without a login at their end.
No. AuraPACS is not a diagnostic device. It stores and displays the images and gives the radiologist a place to write; the interpretation is theirs.
Tell us how you work today. We will show you what the platform would look like for you, and give you a clear scope and timeline.
Founder-led · Chennai, India · Built and supported by the person who wrote it